Ibn ʿAbbās is cited in different ways. Some reports use strong language about the People of the Book changing, writing, or distorting. Other reports warn Muslims not to ask the People of the Book while still assuming they possess a Book that can be discussed.
So the careful answer is this: Ibn ʿAbbās can be used in Muslim taḥrīf discussions, but one quotation does not settle whether he meant total textual replacement of the Bible as opposed to distortion, false teaching, or misuse.
Why Ibn ʿAbbās matters
Ibn ʿAbbās is one of the most important early Qurʼān interpreters. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 7363 reports him warning Muslims not to ask the People of the Book when Muslims have the newest revelation. The report says the People of the Book changed and wrote with their hands.
That wording matters. But it appears in a warning against depending on Jewish and Christian religious authority, not as a detailed manuscript-history argument about every biblical text in every language.
Where quotations can mislead
Dawah clips often quote one line and stop. A careful reader asks: Is Ibn ʿAbbās talking about textual replacement, false interpretation, forged religious writing, or relying on corrupted teachers? How does that report relate to Qurʼān passages that still tell the People of the Gospel to judge by the Gospel?
The answer may not be one-dimensional. Early Muslim warnings about the People of the Book do not automatically become a detailed claim that every biblical manuscript was replaced before Islam.
Historical context
By Ibn ʿAbbās’s time, Jewish and Christian scriptures already existed in multiple languages and regions. A claim that all were replaced before Islam has to explain the manuscript record. That is why this question links back to Bible transmission rather than stopping with a single report.
Two ways to understand the report
Strong taḥrīf reading
A Muslim may say: Ibn ʿAbbās clearly knew the People of the Book had changed their scripture, so Muslims should not trust the Bible.
Cautious historical reading
Others say: the report shows early Muslim suspicion of Jewish and Christian religious authority, but it does not by itself map the full manuscript history of the Bible.
Sources to read
Click a source title to read it on an authoritative site (quran.com for the Qurʼān and tafsīr; sunnah.com for ḥadīth).
| Source | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 7363 | Ibn ʿAbbās warning against asking the People of the Book. |
| Q 5:47 | People of the Gospel told to judge by what Allah revealed in it. |
| Q 5:68 | People of the Book told to uphold Torah and Gospel. |
How to think about it
- Read the report as a report. Do not turn it into more than it says.
- Ask what kind of changing is in view. False writing, false teaching, and replacement of all manuscripts are different claims.
- Compare it with the Qurʼān. Qurʼān passages about upholding and judging by earlier scripture remain part of the evidence.
Common objections
- Doesn’t Bukhārī 7363 prove the Bible is corrupt?
It proves a serious early Muslim warning about the People of the Book. It does not by itself answer every question about biblical manuscripts before Islam.
Related questions
Want a private, source-backed conversation about this question? Ask it in chat — voice or text — and the assistant will quote the verses and ḥadīth in full.